Ephlux Blog - Agile Enterprise Business Solutions and Services
Click here to go Home
About Ephluxg Servicesf Solutionse Industriesd Success StoriescAlliancesEphlux InsightsbCareersaPress Room

Social Networks – ‘Timely’ Blessing or a Curse

Social Networks – ‘Timely’ Blessing or a CurseSocial media is, by definition, supposed to be a social experience, but it has left many of us addicted to its environment. Usually it is facebook.com or myspace.com going first into the address bar. It all starts with creating a profile, adding photos, finding friends, updating statuses, chatting with friends and playing games. And the best part is: we never know how time will fly, leaving us with a loss of several hours of productivity.

And this is why some employers have banned social media sites — as well as other potential time wasting avenues — from the office. Few employers argue that social networks are inherently bad, but what makes these sites great (freedom to post what’s on your mind, discuss the day’s hot topics, post silly pictures) is also what makes these sites a threat in terms of effective utilization of time.

Many companies found their confidential details and meeting agendas being posted on FB by their employees. But banning social sites is not going to help, employees use smart phones to connect to any of these sites. However, they can practice task tracking and assignment completions instead of ‘taking the toys away and hoping children don’t find something else to play with’.

Furthermore, people have reported a decline in their overall performance with the ban on social networks. They say that it was very refreshing and enjoyable to check statuses and posting comments in a few minutes of break from work.

People who are task-oriented and responsible for their deliverables (in fact everybody is responsible for their deliverables) carefully watch their time. Banning social sites would do nothing but make them feel as if they are working in a primary school’s computer lab, where they’ll regularly receive a ‘not enough permission’ message while doing research work.

Coming to the conclusion – on one hand many companies have declared social networks as complete time wastage, but on the other, there are a number of firms getting lucrative businesses from the same ‘time wasters’.

What is your vote regarding social networks: blessing or a curse, in terms of time utilization? Kindly give your feedback with rationale. A Conclusion shall be published at the end.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Handling Criticism

Criticism sounds to be a negative word but normally we do not realize its importance in our lives, whether it be personal or professional. It can be both constructive as well as destructive, it largely depends on the way it is communicated and where it is coming from.Criticism

Criticism can either generate positive result (s) by communicating it in a constructive manner by criticizing the work and not the person, or it can also yield an undesirable outcome by hampering one’s self confidence completely. Therefore, criticizing one’s performance and acknowledging it with grace is not something which everyone can do professionally and positively.

Usually, the person criticizing one’s work/action takes it to a personal level and starts a confrontation which is never positive, rather it creates rigidity on the part of the receiver being criticized, resulting in denial of one’s mistakes/blunders which can never lead to corrective measures.

Kindly give your suggestions on how criticism can be ‘conveyed’ and ‘acknowledged’ positively and professionally at work or otherwise to achieve superior results. Furthermore, kindly share your experiences on how you handle/deal with it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Is SaaS a friend or foe of open source?

Dries Buytaert of Drupal and Acquia is warning that Software as a Service is becoming a threat to open source and that clouds could create the same vendor lock-in customers sought to avoid with open source.

Even where SaaS companies let customers take back their data, they often don’t let them take the code underlying it, he wrote in a blog post. Data without software is useless.

One of the main open source concerns about SaaS in the past has been that the largest open source outfits, like Google, don’t support true copyleft through the Affero license. Google itself prefers the Apache license to anything copyleft, and this is fast becoming the norm.

Buytaert believes open source companies can disrupt this model through services like his own Drupal Gardens, which allows exporting of codes, themes, and data to any other Drupal hosting environment.

My own problem with Drupal Gardens is more prosaic. It is entering what has become a mature space. It would be tough for me to move my current Typepad blog over there, for instance, or this WordPress blog. It would take technical expertise most users don’t have.

Also, the online excitement has moved on. Blogging, as a frontier, is so last decade. The talk today is all about social networking, about tweeting your tweets, either as part of a dialog or just for publicity. The lock-in, in other words, has already occurred and the world has moved on.

The good news is there are many areas of enterprise IT, like healthcare, that on the whole remain frontiers. SaaS is a big player in these frontiers. If users can be made to understand the issues they might press for the changes Dries seeks.

Reference: http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=5982

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Apple’s E-Book Pricing Flip: Chaotic or Cunning?

At first, it seemed Apple was currying favor from book publishers by letting them have their way when it comes to iBookstore e-book pricing. Now a report indicates that Apple has required publishers to lower an e-book’s price to below $10 if the title becomes a best-seller. Was it a communication breakdown or a brilliantly executed power play by Cupertino?

At first, it seemed Apple was currying favor from book publishers by letting them have their way when it comes to iBookstore e-book pricing. Now a report indicates that Apple has required publishers to lower an e-book’s price to below $10 if the title becomes a best-seller. Was it a communication breakdown or a brilliantly executed power play by Cupertino?
Apple’s  role as the book publishing industry’s white knight may be over even before it has begun. Cupertino may not be willing to allow publishers as much leeway in setting their own e-book prices as previously thought, according to a New York Times report.

After unveiling the iPad Jan. 27, Apple shook the e-book world with its statement on e-book pricing. Several major publishers have agreed to provide content at the iPad’s iBookstore. That sparked a battle with Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN), which capped e-book prices on its Kindle e-readers at US$9.99.

However, Apple’s contract reportedly contains a provision that required publishers to discount their prices on best-sellers.

That may leave Amazon twisting in the wind, as it recently agreed to let Macmillan match ebook Download Free eBook - The Edge of Success: 9 Building Blocks to Double Your Sales prices on the iPad and give the publisher a bigger cut of the take.

Rust on the Armor

When he unveiled the iPad, Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced agreements with five major publishers — the Hachette Book Group; HarperCollins Publishers; Macmillan; the Penguin Group; and Simon & Schuster.

The terms of the agreements let the publishers set e-book prices and give them a 70 percent take of the selling price.

Publishers indicated they would charge between $12.99 and $14.99 for e-books, well above the $9.99 ceiling Amazon had imposed. Further, Amazon took a 50 percent cut of a book’s selling price.

Apparently, the agreements with Apple had provisions which required publishers to discount e-book prices on best-sellers. They also require publishers who offer hardcover editions of books at less than the industry-norm of $26 to peg e-book prices to the lower level.

What’s Behind the Change?

Apple’s reasons for the pricing change, if the report is correct, remain murky. They could be evidence that Apple’s gaming the market. “Apple’s trying to play both sides of the fence,” Andrew Eisner, director of content at Retrevo, told MacNewsWorld. “On the one hand, it’s trying to appear friendlier to book publishers with its willingness to let them charge higher prices; on the other, they know they’re going to be out there doing battle with the likes of Amazon and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), who already skirmished in a book price war late last year.”

Or, Apple could be wracked by internal dissension. “It sounds like there could be several different people working on this, and I wonder if Steve Jobs was involved at all,” Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group, told MacNewsWorld. “It does seem like the change is kind of fast, and it’s scaring all the publishers.”

This may not be the first change the iPad has seen in its short life outside of seclusion in Apple’s laboratories; shortly after Apple unveiled the device, it hinted that it would cut prices if necessary.

There’s one more possibility — that this is part of a Machiavellian plan by Cupertino to leave the competition flat-footed. “The iTunes model was based on lower prices for music, and Apple ended up being the 900-pound gorilla in that space,” Enderle pointed out. “It never forgot that.”

The iPad’s advent and the unrest it stirred among publishers drove Amazon to consider the agency model and, now that Amazon’s committed to higher-priced books, Apple’s going back to the $9.99 level, Enderle said. “If this isn’t a screw-up, it’s got to be one of the most brilliant coups in Apple’s history.”

Fear and Loathing Among Publishers

Indications that publishers were less than thrilled about Apple’s pricing began appearing earlier this week, as media reports indicated Jobs’ courting of publishers to provide content for the iPad wasn’t going smoothly.

Some publishers were apparently concerned that the revenue model didn’t make sense for those who offered subscriptions. Others were afraid that Apple would do to the publishing industry what it did to the music business with iTunes — drive prices to rock-bottom.

Perhaps publishers might begin flocking back to the Kindle and to Barnes & Noble’s (NYSE: BKS) Nook.

Amazon.com did not respond to requests for comment by press time. Barnes & Noble spokesperson Mary Ellen Keating declined comment.

Article URL: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/69375.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Succession Planning

It refers to making an employee eligible for a planned change in role within the organization. It is of huge significance because if a crucial employee departs unexpectedly then somebody is immediately needed to takeover his/her position since hiring someone from outside can be time consuming and the new recruit may take time to adjust in the environment plus understanding the ongoing business practices.Succession Planning

Besides, it can also facilitate when a company feels that there is a possibility that their business might expand in the near or distant future. Therefore, they need to identify talented employees, beforehand and provide them with essential training thus preparing them for broader responsibilities and superior roles. As a result, it opens more expansion opportunities for the companies who have adopted this process.

On the other hand, it may not be that simple to implement, as it tends to increase employee expectation levels and can sometimes de-motivate candidates not promoted during the process. Its success is also linked with employee development plans, particularly with the support of the management.

Have your say – what according to you are the pros and cons associated with succession planning? Moreover, how it can be made more effective for short and long term success of the business.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Agile Development ……the dynamic way for the dynamic world

Agile Software Development is a methodology for software development that promotes development iterations, open collaboration, and adaptability throughout the life-cycle of the project. With Ernst…

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace

Try another way - The Agile way

Watch this video to learn why:

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • description
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tipd
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • MySpace